Where does U.S. Soccer go from here?
Carl Hammond is the Active World Cup statistical guru and has watched every moment of the World Cup. We sat down with him to get his thoughts on the performance of the U.S. Soccer team and what the future may hold.
Okay. First question. What the heck happened with the US Team?
They scored a goal. I was worried before the tournament started that that might not even happen.
Here’s the thing. I just was really glad the US didn’t beat Germany in 2002 because it would have raised everyone’s expectations even higher than they were. But people who watch soccer on a consistent basis know that when it comes to putting quality players at every position we just aren’t there yet.
So what does the future hold for U.S. Soccer?
It will probably take another three or four years before the U.S. can produce another team that can compete effectively. The cupboard is bare. When you look at the bench there aren’t a lot of young players chopping at the bit. The good news is that there are a lot of really good players in the under- 20 ranks that have played extremely well in world tourneys.
The other thing that was tough was that they were very unlucky in that draw. Had they been in four of the other groups they would have qualified? It saddens me when people complain about the refs. It shows a lack of mental toughness. The good news is that level of mental toughness is in American athletes. We just need it to reach our soccer players.
Is it possible that our players need to play in Europe more—rather than MLS-- to prepare for the World Cup?
We have enough players playing in Europe. Without MLS we wouldn’t have had success in Japan and Korea. MLS is absolutely critical to the success of the national team. MLS has now found the financial stability to provide the incubator for younger players to develop their game. Unfortunately it’s not going to happen overnight and we’ve been saying for the last 20 years.
Do you think Coach Bruce Arena will be coaching the team in four years?
He’s got the easiest job in the world. The amount of press scrutiny is minimal. He refuses to talk to the press--they put up with it. He’s a hard person to read. I just get the feeling that he’s looking to do something else. I wouldn’t be surprised if he left and came back.
Would U.S. Soccer ever think of removing him?
U.S. Soccer is a political organization so it’s very hard to predict what they’re going to do. If I had to make a prediction I would say the next coach of the US team would be German coach and soccer star Jurgen Klinsmann. That’s not a new idea. He loves America—and he can make a lot of money doing it.
Was playing Damarcus Beasley out of position a mistake?
I think playing Beasley on the right side against the Czech Republic was a tactical error for two reasons. 1) Beasley is a left- footed player. His creating foot is his left foot. I blame the coaching staff for moving him over there. 2) He had not shown in games leading up that he was mentally and physically prepared to play in the World Cup. It was not going to solve the problem by putting him there on right side. It should be noted that he has made amazing plays on the right side. But in those games he started on the left side and drifted over.
Is Ghana really that good?
Well….I fell in love with African soccer in 1990 when Cameroon beat Argentina in the opening game 1-0. They had two players red carded off the field and they were attacking with four or five players. Argentina had no idea what to do. The beauty of African soccer in the past--and the tragedy of it as well—was that they were athletic and very unpredictable but not always tactically sound.
Twenty years later you find the African soccer teams are becoming more tactically sophisticated. Look at the Ghana/U.S. match. When we got that first goal Ghana pulled back into a very defensive mindset. That’s a very sophisticated way of playing and they pulled it off. I think Ghana is a really good team. I wish they didn’t have to play Brazil next.











Shilla 

De Rossi 

PowerStats creator 

